View Single Post
Old 05-09-2015, 11:18 PM   #30
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg View Post
While it's hard to describe what I mean by quality, it has only a smiggen to do with copy editing errors.

I read about fifty eBooks a year, and, except for a few uncorrected scans gotten from openlibrary.org, I've never noticed a major publisher Overdrive (or 3M, or Axis360, or OneClickDigital) eBook as bad as you describe.

Then, I'm not a good copy editor myself, so maybe I'm just lucky in unconsciously ingoring the errors.
What does errors in publisher books have to do with OverDrive per se?
To name one example of why this is a lousy yardstick: I myself have noticed a depressing lack of backlist in OverDrive. Backlist -- THE most likely kind of ebook to be utterly mistreated by publishers.

And I read far, far more than 50 books a year, and I don't focus on niche books (I believe you read a lot of academic-funded works?), and I have noticed the same trend as murg. And it isn't even limited to backlist.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote