View Single Post
Old 05-08-2015, 05:51 PM   #19
murg
No Comment
murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,240
Karma: 23878043
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo: Not just an eReader, it's an adventure!
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
I am trying to understand your logic here. According to you:

price fixing == multiple competitors, agreement, set prices.
agency pricing == individual acts to set prices.
publishers accused of == multiple competitors, agreement, agency pricing
==>
publishers accused of != price fixing.


For the purposes of this discussion, it is important to note that "setting a minimum price" is an instantiation of "setting prices".


Aside: I see you feel it important to point out that they settled without admitting guilt. Just curious, what difference you feel that actually makes to anyone on the planet?
For those of us humans reading the above:
  • == means equals
  • != means not equals

I think that ==> means therefore...
murg is offline   Reply With Quote