Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz
I am trying to understand your logic here. According to you:
price fixing == multiple competitors, agreement, set prices.
agency pricing == individual acts to set prices.
publishers accused of == multiple competitors, agreement, agency pricing
==>
publishers accused of != price fixing.
For the purposes of this discussion, it is important to note that "setting a minimum price" is an instantiation of "setting prices".
Aside: I see you feel it important to point out that they settled without admitting guilt. Just curious, what difference you feel that actually makes to anyone on the planet?
|
For those of us humans reading the above:
- == means equals
- != means not equals
I think that ==> means therefore...