View Single Post
Old 05-07-2015, 06:46 AM   #241
MikeB1972
Gnu
MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,222
Karma: 15625359
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Device: BeBook,JetBook Lite,PRS-300-350-505-650,+ran out of space to type
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
What exception is this, Mike? Do you have a reference, please? I wasn't aware of such an exception.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2014/9780111112694

31B) 1) is the relevant clause
31B Making and supply of accessible copies by authorised bodies
(1) If an authorised body has lawful possession of a copy of the whole or part of a published work, the body may, without infringing copyright, make and supply accessible copies of the work for the personal use of disabled persons.

31F) 6) covers a library as an authorised body (Educational or not for profit)

Non legalese version
https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...led_people.pdf

It mostly depends on whether you can make a case that as no signed version is available then the person signing is acting on behalf of the disables person.

I have a feeling that the main stumbling block will be convincing the judge that the person managed to learn to sign but not read
MikeB1972 is offline   Reply With Quote