Quote:
Originally Posted by mandy314
TMy contribution? Found a couple of double entries:
- Lucky Jim (listed in 40s and 50s, book was published in 1954)
- The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay (90s twice listed and that was a close one)
Waiting with great expectations for the voting/discussion. Should be the noble thing to do: do vote only for books you have read.
Will it be "vote for the best" or "vote for the three best (1-2-3)"?
|
Thanks for the corrections. Now fixed.
I will certainly be suggesting in the voting threads that people should not vote for books if they haven't read them at all. I would hope that if someone does read previews of the nominated books, they'll
want to read all of the book they vote for - otherwise there wouldn't be much point in voting for it.
But I'm not going to insist that people must have
finished a book before voting - not everyone reads very quickly and/or has a lot of time for reading.