View Single Post
Old 05-05-2015, 07:36 AM   #6
Prestidigitweeze
Fledgling Demagogue
Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Prestidigitweeze's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,384
Karma: 31132263
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: White Plains
Device: Clara HD; Oasis 2; Aura HD; iPad Air; PRS-350; Galaxy S7.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubemonkey View Post
Apple plans on charging $7.99 for Beats, which is $2 less than what the other major players charge. Apple's strategy is to get the music industry to pull the plug on ad-supported free streaming in the hopes that those who got it free will then migrate to Beats for $7.99 instead of Spotify for $9.99.
If Apple's goal really is true parity, then the question is if they plan to keep their service completely free or if the distinction they're making is merely an excuse for price fixing by arbitrary disqualification.

If that really is Apple's strategy and it works, then what's to stop them from suddenly introducing ads after the competition gnaws pippin-skin carpet?

Last edited by Prestidigitweeze; 05-08-2015 at 07:09 AM.
Prestidigitweeze is offline   Reply With Quote