View Single Post
Old 12-18-2008, 12:41 AM   #1185
DaleDe
Grand Sorcerer
DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DaleDe's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,470
Karma: 13095790
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Grass Valley, CA
Device: EB 1150, EZ Reader, Literati, iPad 2 & Air 2, iPhone 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryE123 View Post
I am very pleased to see the member from aztak being so (seemingly) open to suggestions from the community but as someone who's followed the thread from the beginning and was lead on by the blatant lies on the aztak representative's part about their suggested production schedules, I think so far aztak is the prime example of vapourware and ebooks. And I really dislike aw well all that grey advertising going on by keeping current a thread from a company that has only managed to deliver a completely unimipressive 6" reader so far, pretty much what everyone else on the planet have done before them and done better. That said I might be negatively inclined towards them by the fact that the aztac representative as I said knowingly lied about their large screen size reader which according to the initial posts should have been a reality six months or so ago... no one can be so far off unless they do it intentionaly.
Everybody in the industry was quoting a fall 2008 release of the 9.7" reader. Netronix, Hanlin, Astak and others. No one else told us why they failed to deliver except Astak. They received a prototype and determined the failure rate was unacceptably high due to the possibility of a broken screen. So, instead, they pushed the delivery date back for a more reliable product with a plastic screen instead of glass. I personally think this was the correct decision. I would have like to see others acknowledge the reason but at least we found out. YMMV.

Dale
DaleDe is offline