View Single Post
Old 04-29-2015, 02:32 AM   #153
PandathePanda
a toy panda
PandathePanda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PandathePanda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PandathePanda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PandathePanda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PandathePanda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PandathePanda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PandathePanda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PandathePanda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PandathePanda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PandathePanda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PandathePanda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PandathePanda's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,568
Karma: 26020474
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Onboard the Queen Anne's Revenge
Device: Various Android dvices
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
Nope, just the people who are trying to bring comparisons that are at right angles to the case.
no it isn't

To explain my point:

1. If my (computer) gets stolen, and the crime is committed (Piracy) I'm Criminally negligent. (your point)

2. If my (car) gets stolen, and the crime is committed (murder) I'm not Criminally negligent. (your point)

so my point isn't at right angles since I was using your point, I just changed the "crime". You can't say point 1 is valid yet point 2 not, since they are the same principle (and if one use it in court it could be a point to have the case dismissed?)
PandathePanda is offline   Reply With Quote