View Single Post
Old 04-23-2015, 07:09 PM   #49
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,435
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgalbrecht View Post
Maybe it's "morally wrong", but it seems to me that it's legally right for them to pay for extensive use of copyrighted material.
We'll see what the German court says about legal rights. I venture no prediction.

I just quoted your post, in full. 100 percent. That's beyond fair use. If you are an American, the post I just reproduced is copyrighted material, as, since 1989, we do not require copyright registration.

How much should I pay you?

Or should Mobileread have to pay -- or close?

The Goebbels heirs are unusual in seeking royalties from a non-fiction author. The heirs of Konrad Adenauer, Willy Brandt, John F. Kennedy, and Ronald Reagan, for whatever reasons (I would suggest -- common decency), don't do it. Living leaders who also are authors, including Angela Merkel, GW Bush, and Barack Obama, don't do it. Should publishers, and self-published authors, who quote from their writings have to pay them off as well?
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote