Quote:
Originally Posted by EowynCarter
Learn to read for crying out loud !!!!
I'm speaking of the part you CAN see !!!
|
... which is of course the absolute definition of a watermark....
I rejected that as a typo or freudian slip, as you previously claimed watermarks are inherently evil.
Since badly-made Ex Libris' are not an intrinsic part of the concept of "watermark", you cannot object to watermarking on the grounds of visible changes.
Nice try at obfuscation, but it didn't work.
If you really objected to
just the visible shmutz, you would have said so in the first place, instead of throwing in all those red herrings about "watermarking".