View Single Post
Old 04-15-2015, 10:08 AM   #20
MikeB1972
Gnu
MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,222
Karma: 15625359
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Device: BeBook,JetBook Lite,PRS-300-350-505-650,+ran out of space to type
Quote:
Originally Posted by darryl View Post
I respectfully disagree. It is an attempt to retain at least this particular aspect of a now obsolete business model which worked, not for everyone, but for the publishers concerned. I expect and hope that it will eventually perish in competition with publishers who do not resort to this practice.
It's not obsolete if it's still in use

Also the same business model is used for many items, DVD, BluRay, CD, Electronics. When the item first comes out it costs more, then, over time, the price decreases. Why would publishers drop a business model that not only works, but is generally understood by (most) consumers to be a perfectly valid model.
MikeB1972 is offline   Reply With Quote