View Single Post
Old 04-14-2015, 02:07 AM   #53
rcentros
eReader Wrangler
rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rcentros's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,916
Karma: 52566355
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Voyage
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
In this case, though, we appear to have a situation of a government accusing companies of exploiting loopholes in the laws of their own country. Laws that they themselves have made. And far from being an impartial enquiry, the title of this thread strongly suggests that the outcome has been pre-determined.
Exactly. They make these laws because corporations -- those who pay out big lobbying dollars -- want them to make these laws. When others (those who didn't "pay their dues," i.e. bribes) take advantage of these laws then suddenly it's a "loophole." That's complete hypocrisy. If there are loopholes in the law, close them. Problem solved. What's the point of an inquiry? It looks like a hypocritical attempt to keep the loopholes for the select while dunning the corporations for whom they weren't originally designed.
rcentros is offline   Reply With Quote