View Single Post
Old 04-13-2015, 09:50 PM   #50
Andrew H.
Grand Master of Flowers
Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
Quote:
Originally Posted by murg View Post
In Australia, we have Part IVA, which basically says that if you enter into a scheme with the sole purpose of avoiding tax, that scheme is illegal and can be declared void.

https://www.ato.gov.au/General/Gen/P...or-income-tax/
The US has a similar provision.

But it's complicated. Is the *sole* reason that Apple has a distribution center in Singapore to avoid taxes in Aus? Are there any business reasons why it might want to have a distribution center in Singapore?

If so, then tax avoidance isn't the "sole purpose" of setting up a distribution center in Singapore and that provision wouldn't apply to them.
Andrew H. is offline   Reply With Quote