View Single Post
Old 04-12-2015, 06:52 AM   #11
MacEachaidh
Browser
MacEachaidh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MacEachaidh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MacEachaidh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MacEachaidh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MacEachaidh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MacEachaidh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MacEachaidh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MacEachaidh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MacEachaidh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MacEachaidh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MacEachaidh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
MacEachaidh's Avatar
 
Posts: 745
Karma: 578294
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Touch, Kobo Aura HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by DNSB View Post
The most complaints I've heard about the lack of colour on eInk readers has to do with displaying the cover image. I don't spend much, if any, time admiring the cover of any books so I don't have any desire for a colour eInk reader at this time. I'd rather they spend the time and effort improving the reading experience.
I agree about wanting them to spend time on reading-related features and improvements -- which is why I whinge when new F/W versions seem to have focused most effort on what I see as social media frippery -- but I personally also really like covers being involved in the experience of a book (provided they're good ones). A good cover can instantly set the mood for a book -- and in fact, if I had the option, I'd have opening a book from the library to go first to the cover every time, with a link then to the bookmark, where one exists.

Covers don't fare so well with relatively low-contrast greyscale. Colour would definitely help there. But also, in photos or diagrams in a book. Not everything people read is purely text-based. Kobo's point holds up well overall, and I generally agree with it, but it also oversimplifies the situation.

I guess what they're really saying is: "We're focusing on text-based content, and if you want something other than that, look elsewhere."
MacEachaidh is offline   Reply With Quote