View Single Post
Old 04-08-2015, 02:29 PM   #139
Rev. Bob
Wizard
Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Rev. Bob's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,760
Karma: 9918418
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Here on the perimeter, there are no stars
Device: Kobo H2O, iPad mini 3, Kindle Touch
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
I'm not looking to "drown" any particular slate. I mean to dilute them with many other competing slates--public or whispered.
Same thing, different word. Basically, you'd prefer to see the puddle become a handful of straws, lessening one slate's influence at what I consider too high a price: a narrower breadth of nominees.

(Note that I'm not talking about a demographic shift in the works nominated, just that ten slates of five nominees is fifty competing works, whereas a thousand people nominating without slates would list far more than that. A slate of demographically diverse nominees is, in my opinion, just as bad as an "all-MilSF" or an "all-Paranormal Romance" slate.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
I don't believe any slate would continue to grow proportionally with an ever increasing pool size.
Why not? It happens in the United States every time there's an election; regardless of the turnout, the proportions stay fairly consistent. Why should I expect this slate to behave differently?
Rev. Bob is offline   Reply With Quote