Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
I'm not looking to "drown" any particular slate. I mean to dilute them with many other competing slates--public or whispered.
|
Same thing, different word. Basically, you'd prefer to see the puddle become a handful of straws, lessening one slate's influence at what I consider too high a price: a narrower breadth of nominees.
(Note that I'm not talking about a demographic shift in the works nominated, just that ten slates of five nominees is fifty competing works, whereas a thousand people nominating without slates would list far more than that. A slate of demographically diverse nominees is, in my opinion, just as bad as an "all-MilSF" or an "all-Paranormal Romance" slate.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
I don't believe any slate would continue to grow proportionally with an ever increasing pool size.
|
Why not? It happens in the United States every time there's an election; regardless of the turnout, the proportions stay fairly consistent. Why should I expect
this slate to behave differently?