View Single Post
Old 04-08-2015, 09:09 AM   #119
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,692
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
You don't need to spend $50 to encourage people to vote for the books that you consider to be worthy candidates.
I don't want to encourage people to vote for the books I consider worthy at all. I want people to vote for the books they consider worthy. Not the ones that some successful campaign platform (regardless of the "honorableness" of its intent) convinced them they should consider worthy. I'm OK with it being a "democratic process," I'm just not OK with how easy it is to gerrymander the nomination process.

Loud-mouthed internet idiots will always attract more votes than a grassroots "hey, I'm a nice guy who think this book is really good" campaign. And I think there's some simple tweaks that could reduce the affect of either type of needless campaign on the nomination process.

Last edited by DiapDealer; 04-08-2015 at 09:11 AM.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote