View Single Post
Old 04-07-2015, 08:21 AM   #70
meeera
Grand Sorcerer
meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
meeera's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,827
Karma: 68407974
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Libra 2, iPadMini4, iPad4, MBP; support other Kobo/Kindles
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
But my point is that they are doing nothing that's against the rules of the Hugo nomination process, and neither are they doing anything that you couldn't do yourself if you want to nominate different works.
I did not say that they broke the technical rules of the process.

You asked "Isn't that what an electoral process is all about? Persuading other people to support your viewpoint? " And my answer was "No."

Not all nomination and electoral processes are the same, and the intrusion of narrow-focus American culture wars into a world SF fandom nomination process, which many of us use to discover new and wonderful books, not just to promote the ones we already know about, is unwelcome and extremely distasteful to many.

I have no interest in promoting a nomination slate, and would side-eye anyone who did. To me, and to many others, that is absolutely not what Hugo nominations are about.
meeera is offline   Reply With Quote