Thread: Image size.
View Single Post
Old 03-27-2015, 02:06 PM   #6
Notjohn
mostly an observer
Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,519
Karma: 987654
Join Date: Dec 2012
Device: Kindle
I use width="100%" in all my images, and I have never seen a bad result in an Kindle, Fire, or emulation.

The narrowest Kindle AFAIK is the Fire tablets with a height/width ratio of 1.6. So any image skinnier than that (say 800x1280 pixels) ought to work just fine at height="100%"

Why wouldn't the Sigil default for a cover image (adapted for your use) work?

<div style="text-align: center; padding: 0pt; margin: 0pt;">
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" height="100%" preserveAspectRatio="xMidYMid meet" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 1800 2700" width="100%" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><image height="2700" width="1800" xlink:href="../Images/YOURIMAGEHERE.jpg" /></svg>
</div>
Notjohn is offline   Reply With Quote