View Single Post
Old 03-25-2015, 09:13 AM   #16
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,111
Karma: 315558332
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catlady View Post
Am I the only one who thinks the decades should be listed as 1900-1909, 1910-1919, 1920-1929, etc.? Don't most people think of the decades that way--e.g., the sixties are 1960-1969, not 1961-1970.
We're doing it as decades of the 20th century, not decades of the 1900s.

[EDIT: People wishing to argue about the definition of the 20th Century, or the best way to split years into decades should start their own thread on the subject in the lounge. Any such posts in this thread will be deleted.]

Last edited by pdurrant; 03-25-2015 at 09:23 AM.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote