Quote:
Originally Posted by GA Russell
It has occurred to me that I don't see a definition of the term "Classic" in the OP. I don't see offhand where we first discussed this issue. Can someone please provide me with a link to the original discussion?
As I recall, there was some debate about whether a book needed to have a certain age on it before it would be considered a classic.
I'll let others consider that. But I would like to add another element.
It seems to me that for a book to be considered a classic, a great many readers must be aware of both 1) its existence, and 2) its good reputation.
Looking at the list of nominations (thus far) in post #2, I see four books I've never heard of before. I am not passing judgment on their merits, but I'm doubtful that English language books I've never heard of can fairly be considered Classics with a capital C.
|
I don't consider the Pratchetts or Clavell to be classics; the rest clearly are. But I figure it's up to the group to decide. Reasonable people can disagree and all that. And with that in mind, I think it's distasteful for people to attack other choices; it would be better just to make a persuasive case in favor of a nomination and let it go at that.