View Single Post
Old 03-13-2015, 04:04 PM   #69
Catlady
Grand Sorcerer
Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Catlady's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,419
Karma: 52613881
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
Quote:
Originally Posted by GERGE View Post
That a destructive scan is legal while a non-destructive one is not is impossible to understand. It is probably marketing, I won't even be able to consider such a thing before seeing the law right in front of me. Even then I would check whether or not I am dreaming.

From a legal point of view, it is non-sense. There could be no law that dictates that you have to destroy your property, it goes against all the basic tenets of property law. You don't need to know any national law to say this, some parts of the property law are universal since Rome.
And if you want to keep only the digital version? If you're not supposed to sell or donate the physical version, what option do you have, then, but to destroy it?

At least that's what the opinions seemed to be when I brought up digitizing LPs in another thread.
Catlady is offline   Reply With Quote