View Single Post
Old 03-13-2015, 09:06 AM   #33
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
A truly new and superior algorithm for digitally encoding audio would be patentable, not copyrightable.
It may or may not be patentable, depending on the jurisdiction. "Pure" software patents are almost never granted by the UK Patent Office, for example. In order to be patentable in the UK, a computer program has to be part of a solution to a "technical problem". A data compression algorithm used as part of a more efficient system for transmitting audio from one place to another probably would be patentable, for example, but the algorithm in isolation wouldn't be.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote