View Single Post
Old 03-12-2015, 10:52 AM   #13
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GERGE View Post
All true expect one count: It may be permissable to photocopy your book to an extent. Check "fair dealing". It exists in many states in some form but sometimes limited to libraries only.
I am sure in some jurisdictions it is allowed. And of course Fair Use long ago settled your right to photocopy portions for academic or journalistic purposes or suchlike.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertDDL View Post
This is very much not of course. A commentary to the Austrian law, relating to printed books, says (in my clumsy translation):

Everyone -- including legal entities -- is allowed to make individual copies for their own private or professional use, though not for the purpose of making the work available to the public. Copies may be shared within the "private sphere." The law says "individual" copies, but does not define a maximum number. The often voiced assumption that this maximum number is 7 does not agree with actual judicature, according to which this number has to be decided in each case, taking into consideration the intended use of those copies. It is not a fact that "individual" copies necessarily always means a small number.

(This is from 1996, so details may have changed, but the basic principle still holds. How it applies to digital texts derived from printed books through scanning and OCR I do not know.)
Well, not in all jurisdictions I guess. The U.S. however delights in being extra-restrictive (well we do have more people) and is particularly prone to lobbying especially.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote