View Single Post
Old 03-08-2015, 10:50 PM   #5
BetterRed
null operator (he/him)
BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 21,741
Karma: 30237526
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaley View Post
Can you provide sources for this? As far as I can tell, by default W7 defrags on Wednesday at 01:00, if the machine is running or can be awakened. On my machines, defrag appears to almost never run automatically.
Whoops confusion - it's my old NT4 server that defrags when its idle, for some reason my typing brain mistakenly thought the workstations were the same.

My workstations defrag dally at 11:00. Yes, I just read the default for Win 7 is Wed 01:00, so I must have changed it back in 2009.

From what I can see the schedule works providing the workstation is on. The 2 drives on this w/s report they were defragged today, one at 11:03 the other at 11:11, it's currently 14:00ish. When the defrag starts the only way I can discern it's running is by the disk lights, not by responsiveness. It takes a few minutes to do 2x2TB WD Caviar blacks. The workstation also has a 256GB SSD system drive. The WD drives have hefty caches and they're no where near full.

I don't defrag external drives, they're also 2TB WD Caviar Blacks. When they're in use I mount them in a disk dock that connects to a PCIe USB 3.0 hub. My observation is that they're faster than the same drives on SATA 2. Again they have hefty caches and they're not too full - and they are compressed.

I'm just not convinced defragging makes a great deal of difference on modern drives with hefty caches, providing the drives are not close to full.

BR

PS - I just recalled, a friend recently bought her Vista laptop for me to have a look at. It started going very slowly after she ran Vista defrag (first time in 7+ years). I managed to speed it up a bit, but it really needs a fresh Windows install - I'm awaiting arrival of Vista Business product. Apparently MS tore their VISTA iso's down last year

Why did she do a defrag - because someone screwed around with her email accounts and got her confused, so she 'thought a defrag might help'

Last edited by BetterRed; 03-08-2015 at 11:10 PM.
BetterRed is offline   Reply With Quote