Quote:
Originally Posted by KyBunnies
I got it just because it seems like a great read.
Just be aware that I might come back here and ask a million questions to GtrsRGr8 & Difflugia after reading  |
As long as the questions don't tread too far into religious opinion.
If you enjoy reading Geisler,
his web page links to a lot more of his writing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GtrsRGr8
Do you think that many, and maybe most, agnostics and atheists are presuppositionalists? Don't many of them start out with with the belief that nothing supernatural can happen or ever did happen in the past?
Consequently, both would say that Creation, any miracles in the Bible, et al. could not have happened and, therefore, did not happen. It seems to me that those supernatural events are the only real evidences that can convince someone that a god exists. The agnostic would say that since these things didn't happen, "I cannot know if there is a god." The atheist would say that since these things didn't happen, "there isn't a god."
|
That's actually more-or-less the position of
presuppositional apologetics (as opposed to
evidential apologetics).
More discussion than that (like which is better) probably belongs in Politics & Religion.
