Quote:
Originally Posted by blackcatw81
That's why the great is between "" 
|
Well, I guess we don't have sarcasm smilies available.
- - - - -
I do agree with your other point, the KT2 is indeed low cost.
- - - - -
The KT2 prefix is a bit of a misnomer -
Internally, it is the second generation K4 (+ ir touchscreen - buttons + newer SoC).
So following our general naming pattern, it would have been the K42 -
Which certainly would have been more confusing than helpful.

(Hmm... I never posted a KT2 and K4 internals picture, side-by-side, but I could if anyone is interested.)