Feedback comments on image size
Dr. Drib,
How could we possibly know we need to "take a few minutes to..." when we had no clue as to why you simply removed content rather than explaining/correcting -content might be removed for any number of reasons. I can't in all honesty regard the ad content I now see displayed in the post as an improvement over an image with the required detail, but at least it apparently fits the 600x600 rule! (Correction: whoops, that must have been only while editing as no ad is displayed now...)
It'd be nice if they made it easier for you and employed input filtering to only accept images up to a certain size or just resized them automatically. I know you're a good guy from years of posts with a wicked sense of humor and a responsibility, all I'm asking is that you maybe clue the rest of us in rather than just creating another mystery as to why something was removed. I realize, ideally the OP would go back and satisfy the request for a correction and resolve the information gap, but that isn't always so.
I hope you understand where I'm coming from -no disrespect intended personally. Frankly, we get more than enough in the way of mysteries in reading many of these posts.
Thanks!
Last edited by TechniSol; 03-01-2015 at 10:18 PM.
|