View Single Post
Old 02-28-2015, 07:25 PM   #207
darryl
Wizard
darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
darryl's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by doctorow View Post
Hard to believe, but there is something similar in the US as well - the Audio Home Recording Act.

Section 1008 of the Act, 17 U.S.C. § 1008:



By its terms Section 1008 provides noncommercial consumers with prescribed statutory immunity from suits for copyright infringement when performing "home taping" of musical recordings. Unlike public distribution (such as file sharing), which might go beyond "noncommercial", it would certainly seem that you can make (noncommercial) copies for your family and friends. Technically you'd still be infringing copyright, but the section above bars actions alleging infringement based on such uses.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_Home_Recording_Act

Thanks for providing the link. It is quite an interesting provision. This bar on actions referred to was not intended to be quite as wide as suggested above, though the article refers to a case where a Court did suggest such a wide interpretation (though probably in non-binding "obiter" comments).

Last edited by darryl; 02-28-2015 at 07:30 PM.
darryl is offline   Reply With Quote