View Single Post
Old 02-24-2015, 04:18 AM   #70
RobertDDL
Whatever...
RobertDDL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RobertDDL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RobertDDL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RobertDDL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RobertDDL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RobertDDL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RobertDDL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RobertDDL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RobertDDL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RobertDDL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RobertDDL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
RobertDDL's Avatar
 
Posts: 197
Karma: 1114225
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Austria
Device: PocketBook InkPad 840, Touch HD 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
In what way to you consider licences to be immoral? What moral precepts do they violate?
The "license" concept for e-books takes away some very basic rights from me -- most of all, the right to keep a book, regardless of future technical, commercial or political developments. In almost all cases, the necessary steps to ensure that I'll still be able to read an ebook in the future, and that I can share it with family and friends in the way that I can share a printed book -- all of it what I consider to be fair use -- explicitly violate the terms of the license. But if I cannot keep a book, if I cannot share it, if I cannot build my own library so that it can last, this ultimately undermines our whole understanding of literature. Morality, of course, is in the eye of the beholder, and I should have tried to argue without claiming it to be on my side.
RobertDDL is offline   Reply With Quote