View Single Post
Old 02-18-2015, 02:14 PM   #5750
crich70
Grand Sorcerer
crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
crich70's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,310
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solitaire1 View Post
They did try a television prequel to "Casablanca" starring David Soul, it didn't last.

Now for something off topic:

There has been talk of simplifying spelling by reducing the number of letters in the alphabet by eliminating unneeded letters. But what if the opposite was actually a better option: Reducing the number of sounds each letter makes to one, and assigning some sounds to new or redefined letters.

As an example is the letter "c." While it does not have a unique sound right now, what if it was given its own sound, that of "ch" (which it does in some words)? In the same way, the letter "x" could be given the "ks" sound, and the ampersand (&) could be given the "and" sound (would "sand" would become "s&" and "stand" would become "st&").
So my nickname would be written Cuck or Cuc if they kep the k sound as part of c instead of Chuck.
crich70 is offline   Reply With Quote