I think it is safe to append this logic:
1. Internet has many torrent sites where "retail" e books can be torrented.
2. Those books were sold only with drm
3. So uploaders to those sites have used de-drm tools to facilitate ebook piracy
QED
I see no moral difference between those uploading de-drm books and those uploading licence freed apps.
in both cases the creator is losing income
In both cases the existence of relevant "tools" de-skills the uploader task.
Demonizing one tool while giving a friendly nod n wink to the other ( google Alf is a well tolerated comment here ) is not really defensible
|