View Single Post
Old 02-16-2015, 08:21 AM   #34
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blossom View Post
No but I think changing how you write to make more money is they are just depriving the world of their true writing talent and I find that sad especially when it's a favorite author and you know they can write better than what their latest book shows. It's like they are no longer even trying anymore.
But this would appear to presume that Harry's examples of Dickens and Shakespeare didn't do exactly that - change how they wrote to make more money.

There are pressures on what professional writers produce. There used to be a book-a-year thing, now the expectation can be even higher. And there are many examples of authors writing under a pseudonym so they could publish in a different genre because of the pressure to always publish something like what they've written before. I imagine that some pressures have changed as society has changed, but those two (produce to a deadline, and produce what the paying audience wants) have probably been around forever.
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote