View Single Post
Old 02-06-2015, 04:08 AM   #14
GrannyGrump
Obsessively Dedicated...
GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
GrannyGrump's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,221
Karma: 35037583
Join Date: May 2011
Location: PA {back in the usa!}
Device: Sony PRS-T2, ADE on PC
rumpumpel1 queried:
Quote:
What kind of errors are these ? Can they be corrected with a spell checker of a decent office program?
A spell-checker can't help when the OCR interprets a dirt-spot as a colon. It can not help when the OCR gives a legitimately spelled word that is the *wrong* word, as in Harry's example of "clock" versus "dock". Other frequent OCR errors include "die" for "the", digit 1 instead of lower-case L or upper-case I (or any other mis-match combination of these three characters), the letters "rn" (that is lower-case R N ) turn out as "m" (that is lower-case M), etc, etc. Italics add more spice to the stew.

A *grammar-checker*, such as Microsoft Word provides, can help to some extent when it recognizes that a word is blatantly wrong for the containing sentence. Unfortunately, it is far from perfect still; and mostly concentrates on punctuation errors.

To get good results, you will have to physically proof-read the scan results, comparing against the printed page.

Last edited by GrannyGrump; 02-06-2015 at 04:15 AM.
GrannyGrump is offline   Reply With Quote