Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewH7
Let's start @ square 1, why modify founts when Tahoma works fine? =2 files, 1 for bold, it does Oblique & Bold Oblique.
|
Perhaps some of us do not like Tahoma?
I personally prefer a serif font for body text -- to me, they are more readable though if you want to argue either side, you'll find multiple studies supporting your point of view.
There are also those who prefer fonts with the 4 most common variants supplied. In the case of Tahoma, you need to play software games to obtain the italic/oblique variants. I find a properly designed italic font to be a better choice.
I won't get into a rant on some of the glyphs in Tahoma -- it's been done elsewhere often enough and by people with far better credentials in typography.