View Single Post
Old 02-02-2015, 04:02 PM   #6
Notjohn
mostly an observer
Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Notjohn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,519
Karma: 987654
Join Date: Dec 2012
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleDe View Post
I don't know what will happen is explicit sizing is used.
That gives me an excuse to ask a question that has long puzzled me. In Sigil, when I insert a cover, this is the code that Sigil generates:

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" height="100%" preserveAspectRatio="xMidYMid meet" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 800 1169" width="100%" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><image height="1169" width="800" xlink:href="../Images/myimage.jpg"/></svg>

Why use both a relative and an absolute dimension? If the absolute dimensions (1169x800) are merely informative, why use them at all?
Notjohn is offline   Reply With Quote