View Single Post
Old 12-24-2014, 08:22 AM   #6
robko
Wizard
robko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.robko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.robko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.robko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.robko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.robko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.robko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.robko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.robko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.robko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.robko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,454
Karma: 5469320
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: Kobo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shades View Post
It's not scientific and they used iPads at full brightness at a fixed range away from the users face. It was funded by big publishers too.
Where is it saying it was funded by big publishers? In the conflict of interest section it says he received royalties from some publishers. That quite possibly means he has published a book through them. Maybe I'm missed where they talked about the funding of the study, but I've only seen the the fact that he received royalties mentioned in other threads.
robko is offline   Reply With Quote