Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres
The issue wasn't the lockdown per se, but that it was implemented via an update that blocked content that was previously accessible.
All those systems you mention started with lockdown.
Not that it mattered in this case: without plaintiffs they had no case anyway.
|
They scraped up a replacement plaintiff from arstechnica readership when Apple found their plaintiffs weren't valid.
Still.
I hate DRM but this was a pretty badly executed/argued/justified lawsuit.