View Single Post
Old 12-16-2014, 06:13 PM   #4
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by mycurlylocks View Post
Glad to see the verdict. I never could understand why it went to court in the first place.

Why isn't there a class action suit against Microsoft? They don't allow us to install whatever we choose on a Windows computer. Or Amazon... Why can't I legally install Google Play on the Fires?

If consumers didn't want the products they wouldn't buy them. Any way, who was to decide what the iPods were actually worth retail?

It's like saying I'm being overcharged if I buy a laptop for $1499 when I could go buy one for $249. It's the consumers' choice what to buy and at what price.
The issue wasn't the lockdown per se, but that it was implemented via an update that blocked content that was previously accessible.
All those systems you mention started with lockdown.

Not that it mattered in this case: without plaintiffs they had no case anyway.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote