View Single Post
Old 12-16-2014, 01:11 PM   #6
Shane R
Fanatic
Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 518
Karma: 4274548
Join Date: Nov 2013
Device: None
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeD View Post
A Judge suggesting it's ok to break the law (i.e collusion) if you're doing it to break the hold of a monopolist? I hope I've either misread that or it has been misreported.
I'm no judge, but according to Wikipedia collusion is not always anti-competitive. The judges were questioning whether this was a pro-competitive form of collusion.
Shane R is offline   Reply With Quote