Quote:
Originally Posted by Shades
If they were focusing on the real issue, there was no reason to name Calibre. The fact is, it was named when there was no reason to do so. You saying it doesn't matter means nothing when, for some reason, it did matter to these groups to specifically point out Calibre. They didn't have to, but they did, in a court of law.
Regardless of whether it matters in this case or not, this has the potential to tarnish Calibre's name. It has the potential make Calibre synonymous with DeDRM and illegal activities. That's the point I'm upset with, not the fact it was mentioned. Honestly, attorneys need to do a lot more investigation on the cases they present in court...
|
Calibre should have been mentioned. But not like it was. It should have been mention because of the plugin. "There is a third party plugin for Calibre that will allow DRM to be stripped when an eBook with DRM is imported into the Calibre Library." or something like that. But not to say that it was Calibre that did the DRM removal. That was stupid and wrong.