From Fortune:
http://fortune.com/2014/12/15/monday...ell-for-apple/
Not expecting anyone's opinion to change. Clearly, though, those of us who have taken the "it's Amazon that's been acting anti-competitive" pov through all of this are seeing our perspective reflected by 2 of the three judges in the appeals case.
Among them:
- a new entrant into a market is a good thing
- Amazon's pricing was arguably predatory
- Amazon had the monopoly position of 90%
Meanwhile the attorney making the case against Apple likened them to a drug runner driving people to a drug deal.