Quote:
Originally Posted by taustin
And the specifics still don't matter. At all. The specific details are not the subject of the suit. At all. The suit is over providing instructions, and not what the instructions are.
When you obsess over something that doesn't matter, the judge and jury tend to believe it's because you can't answer the actual allegations. And you lose.
|
If they were focusing on the real issue, there was no reason to name Calibre. The fact is, it was named when there was no reason to do so. You saying it doesn't matter means nothing when, for some reason, it did matter to these groups to specifically point out Calibre. They didn't have to, but they did, in a court of law.
Regardless of whether it matters in this case or not, this has the potential to tarnish Calibre's name. It has the potential make Calibre synonymous with DeDRM and illegal activities. That's the point I'm upset with, not the fact it was mentioned. Honestly, attorneys need to do a lot more investigation on the cases they present in court...