View Single Post
Old 12-15-2014, 09:53 AM   #133
Rizla
Member Retired
Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rizla ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,183
Karma: 11721895
Join Date: Nov 2010
Device: Nook STR (rooted) & Sony T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
It's the way the two sentences were structured:



I knew what you meant, but I think that the other poster was looking at the first two sentences as a construct.

Vis-à-vis the Supreme Court:

Actually, 2 members were appointed by Obama; two by Clinton; two by GW Bush; two by GHW Bush (one of whom, mind you, is Souter--that well-known conservative firebrand, LOL--NOT, for those who don't follow SCOTUS); Reagan appointed Scalia and Kennedy. This is, if you look at it, regardless of who appointed whom, one of the most-balanced courts that has existed in decades.

Hitch
Ah, I see. Thanks. I should be more careful with my paragraph composition in future for those who can't see the meaning obviously intended. Still not sure if the poster misunderstood me or is being sarcastic. The former, I fear.
Rizla is offline   Reply With Quote