View Single Post
Old 12-15-2014, 08:43 AM   #130
Barcey
Wizard
Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Barcey's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,531
Karma: 8059866
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo H2O / Aura HD / Glo / iPad3
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieTigger View Post
@Hitch, it is too bad that you are giving up. I can clearly understand your frustration in having to explain everything multiple times. It was even more on topic than you might have thought: it is the fault of ALL warehouse employees that did the theft AND merely knew about it and let it happen.
It's not about fault at all. It's about a company trying to implement loss mitigation processes and who pays. It's assuming that the majority of the lost inventory is walking out with employees and then putting a process in place to screen the employees. I believe it should be incumbent on the company to pay for that and since they are paying making it as efficient as possible. Another option would be to increase the number of security cameras and security staff that monitors them. Should the employees pay for that? Another option would be to increase security staff who search garbage bins and shipping bays. Should the employees pay for that? Trying to make it about fault is not logical.
Barcey is offline   Reply With Quote