View Single Post
Old 12-15-2014, 07:56 AM   #27
jj2me
Guru
jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 820
Karma: 8820388
Join Date: Dec 2008
Device: Sony PRS-505, -350; Kindle 3 3G, DX, PW 2; various tablets
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
How much 'slightly'? -2 perhaps? Natural mono-vision, one eye for distance, one eye for near.
I don't know how much. But how can it be natural mono vision, if one eye still has perfect vision? It must still be working for both tasks.

I read your post with either eye this morning using Tapatalk on a 4.7" phone. That's small print, and I also had a night filter applied (meaning the screen's brightness is very low, with the app set to about 75% opacity). That's definitely not -2.

The 62-year old woman I referenced in my previous post could read fine print using either eye and had better far vision with either eye than I had. I think if you looked, you could find many examples of people over their mid-40s that don't need glasses, contrary to your claim. Discounting me because of the "one eye slightly nearsighted" (even though I don't wear glasses), I found an example of perfect vision over 60.
jj2me is offline   Reply With Quote