View Single Post
Old 12-13-2014, 07:25 PM   #25
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,705
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
But the problem with the link to the online CSS validator is that it barfs when there are embedded fonts. That's not how a properly working CSS validator should work. And when you up the CSS level, you also validate for things that aren't valid in ePub 2. So it's not as useful as you might think.
Issues you may have with WHAT the validator passes/fails, Jon, aren't really appropriate here. We were discussing why the tool might not be working AT ALL, and what might need to be fixed if there's situations/platforms where it's not. Your complaint is something else entirely.

And for the record... it doesn't "barf" with embedded fonts. It correctly notes the fact that the 'font-family" property doesn't exist for the CSS-level it was told to validate against (CSS 2.1). Unfortunate for validating ePubs with embedded fonts? Yes. Barf? No.

Last edited by DiapDealer; 12-13-2014 at 08:09 PM.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote