Quote:
Originally Posted by Doonge
Just jumping while the train is still running, but could you point to me examples of situations where the acts of some do not affect the outcome for all (absolute zero)?
I fail to see the relevance of that distinction.
It seems to me there's always a compromize to be made?
edit: it seems it's your entire point, so in fact I agree with you and the question should be asked to taustin.
|
Doonge:
Yes, exactly. It seems that I should have used a less-emotionally-charged issue to make my point, but I forget sometimes that I'm on a public forum where not everyone has had to learn to distinguish between facts and opinion, emotions and logic, as part of their education. (Of course: it helps to have a natural inclination toward logic.)
It was
a simple logic/mathematical exercise: Set A does X, subset of A does Y, and Z is the result for the entire set of A. I thought it was pretty obvious, but clearly, some people would rather be angry than strive for comprehension.
You are precisely correct:
there are no absolute zero outcomes. ;-)
Hitch