Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch
Wow...
I sure am glad I wasted all those study hours in Logic and Language, and Ethics, in school!
You did completely miss the point of my post. It has nothing to do with what the people who are PROTESTING are CLAIMING. (Although I admit: I'm pretty gobsmacked to think that those folks really believe that ALL police are corrupt. That's pretty mind-blowing--but not the point.)
It has to do with perception, and how the acts of some affect the outcome for all. Like I said: it's a logic exercise. I see now that there's no reason to continue the effort.
ETA: @Cfrizz: THANK YOU! MUCHO!
Hitch
|
Just jumping while the train is still running, but could you point to me examples of situations where the acts of some do not affect the outcome for all (absolute zero)?
I fail to see the relevance of that distinction.
It seems to me there's always a compromize to be made?
edit: it seems it's your entire point, so in fact I agree with you and the question should be asked to taustin.