View Single Post
Old 12-12-2014, 01:49 PM   #41
taustin
Wizard
taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,358
Karma: 5766642
Join Date: Aug 2010
Device: Nook
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apache View Post
Not for individuals in the US. A contract saying an ex employee can not ply his trade anywhere in the US is illegal. You can not keep someone from making a living. You can enforce a non compete clause for a specific distance. For example within 50 miles of you current employer. You can not keep him from working in the same field in all 50 states and territories of the US. On the other hand, if it can be proven that the employee poached existing customers that could result in a lawsuit
Apache
I believe that Little.Egret is referring to something entirely different - when the owner of a company sells it, and signs a contract promising to not compete with the company they just sold for a certain amount of time. And those are enforceable, at least sometimes.

Employees and owners are not the same thing, though.
taustin is offline   Reply With Quote