View Single Post
Old 12-11-2014, 06:51 PM   #23
taustin
Wizard
taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,358
Karma: 5766642
Join Date: Aug 2010
Device: Nook
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apache View Post
If a contract is deemed to be vague or have more than one meaning the party that wrote said contract is held responsible.
This isn't a matter of ambiguity or vagueness. It's a matter of what contracts are, and are not, allowed to do, regardless of what they say. You can sign a contract that says the other party can eat your first born child for dinner, but it's still murder. Some rights cannot be given up, and fair use rights are among them.

Again, copyrights are governed by Title 17, copyright law, not contract law.
taustin is offline   Reply With Quote