Quote:
Originally Posted by taustin
That would be a case against the end user who actually removes the DRM, which would be irrelevant as a counterclaim in this case. Helping people remove the DRM is contributory infringement, which is what they claimed here (and lost).
|
I was referring to the trafficking side of the DMCA which there's debate surrounding what is/is not trafficking, from providing software, linking to it or otherwise pointing people towards it.
Although in this case I still think that's a stretch as calibre in and of itself is not a DRM removal tool.